Prbl vs Aikido

Prbl vs Aikido for AI-generated code

Aikido is a modern, developer-friendly platform that bundles SAST, dependency scanning, secrets, and cloud posture in one place. Prbl is narrower: it specializes in the flaws AI coding tools produce, and it checks your live app as well as your repo.

FeaturePrblThem
All-in-one breadth (SCA, cloud, secrets, SAST)Focused on AI-code SASTCore strength
AI-generated file detectionYes, built for thisNo
AI-scaffolding vulnerability classes prioritizedYesGeneral SAST rules
Live-URL exposure check (open Supabase, leaked keys)YesLimited
False-positive postureTuned under 10 percent on AI-code classesGood, general
Auto-fix for findingsYes, AI rewriter with behavioral baselineAutofix and guidance
SetupPaste a repo or URL, no configConnect repos and cloud
Pricing entry pointFree, $29/mo ProFree tier, paid for teams

Where Aikido wins

If you want one developer-friendly dashboard covering dependencies, cloud posture, secrets, and code, Aikido is a strong modern platform. For a team that wants broad AppSec coverage in a single tool without enterprise heaviness, it is a sensible pick.

Where Prbl is different

Aikido spreads across the whole security surface. Prbl goes deep on one slice: the code an AI assistant wrote and the mistakes it makes repeatedly, including hardcoded secrets in scaffolding, missing authentication on generated routes, fallback secrets in environment lookups, and Broken Object Level Authorization. It also scans your deployed app from the outside for exposure that never shows up in the repo.

Which to choose

Aikido is the broad platform; Prbl is the sharp AI-code check. If you rely heavily on Cursor, Copilot, Lovable, or Claude Code, Prbl adds signal Aikido is not tuned for, and the two work well together.

Prbl vs Aikido: AI Code Security Alternative